Ricardo Semler headlines the Corporate Rebels Summit 2026. Amsterdam, 19–20 November.

Explore the summit →

Juicy Marbles: Combining Autonomy and Learning on the Path Toward Decentralization

Maria Lorenzo
Written by Maria Lorenzo September 01, 2025

Juicy Marbles was founded in Slovenia in 2019 with the ambition to create plant-based steaks that could rival animalproducts in both taste and appearance. From the beginning, the company stood out not only for its technological innovation but also for the way it approached work. The founders and the first employees came from backgrounds outside food production, including marketing and IT. This mix shaped an early culture that was more open and less hierarchical than what is common in traditional manufacturing.

This blog post is part of 80+ case studies of progressive organizations we created for the ZeroDX awards 2025. These organizations embody the principles of RenDanHeYi in their work structures:

  • Zero Distance to customer: Decision what to build is based on insights from the marketplace

  • Autonomy: Small teams with full decision-making autonomy enable speed in execution

  • Shared Rewards: Everyone in the micro-enterprise participates in its financial success.

When Ana Gabršček joined in 2022 as the company’s first HR professional, there were only ten employees. With no established systems in place, she started developing HR processes from the ground up. As she recalled, the reference point was never the typical production company template but rather practices familiar from more agile industries.

By 2024, Juicy Marbles had grown to about sixty employees, and this rapid expansion made clear that some adjustments were necessary. In the early stage, decision-making was almost fully decentralized, with everyone taking responsibility informally. As the team passed twenty people, informal coordination became more difficult. Theleadership team chose to reorganize parts of the company to improve information flow.

Today, the production and supply chain areas are more structured, with clear reporting lines and designated roles. According to Ana, this was an intentional decision to ensure clarity and safety in daily operations. At the same time, functions such as HR, finance, legal, and IT have remained highly self-managed, with small teams operating independently and coordinating through regular planning.

One of the practices that reflects the company’s commitment to autonomy is the way hiring and onboarding are conducted. In the production area, new employees are mentored by their colleagues rather than by a single manager. After an initial trial period, the team votes on whether the person should stay. If the group agrees that there is not a good fit, the contract ends. This shared responsibility aligns with the idea of decentralizing authority and trusting teams to take ownership of important decisions.

Transparency has also been a priority. Management meeting notes are shared openly with employees. While thecompany decided not to make all financial data fully transparent—mainly because the distribution of costs acrossdifferent legal entities could create confusion—employees receive clear information about investments, costs, and decisions. For example, when Juicy Marbles went through a reorganization that involved letting some employees go, the leadership team explained the financial background and the purpose of the changes. According to Ana, people appreciated this level of openness and did not feel that information was being withheld.

In the framework of RenDanHeYi principles, autonomy is the area where Juicy Marbles has advanced the most.Employees have broad freedom to make decisions within their areas, and leaders are expected to coordinate rather than control. This reflects the principle that every person can be treated as a responsible contributor.

Decentralization, however, has been more challenging to maintain at scale. Ana described how the organization was fully decentralized when it was very small. But as the company grew, coordination became harder, and some centralization was necessary to regain stability. The current phase is seen as transitional. Over time, the plan is to evolve again toward a more distributed model, supported by clearer processes and better tools for sharing information.

Customer closeness is another area where Juicy Marbles is still developing. In the early years, the company relied mainly on its own intuition. Because the first product had strong market acceptance, this approach worked for a time. As the market has matured, however, the leadership team has recognized that internal ideas alone are no longer enough. About a year before the interview, Juicy Marbles began introducing structured consumer testing, including surveys and in-person product trials. The appointment of a new R&D team lead was a step intended to strengthen the link between customer insights and product development. Ana explained that this mindset shift is still in progress, and the company is working to place the customer at the center of decisions.

The balance between autonomy, decentralization, and customer focus is not always simple. Ana described how the company had to pause and consolidate before taking the next steps. She also noted that investors expect clear arguments and evidence to justify further changes. This has made the pace of transformation more gradual than if the organization had full freedom to move in any direction.

Overall, Juicy Marbles has developed a distinctive approach that combines a strong foundation of trust with the willingness to adapt as the company grows. Autonomy remains the principle most embedded in the culture, whiledecentralization and customer centricity are areas the team continues to strengthen. The experience so far shows thatbuilding a self-managing organization is not a one-time decision but an ongoing process of learning, adjustment, and renewal.

Written by Maria Lorenzo
Maria Lorenzo
Read more
Jun 29, 2026
Optimist vs pessimist vs realist: 3 types of colleagues you meet in every change effort
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
You probably know the joke already.Three people walk into a bar and stare at a glass of beer.The optimist says, "It's half full."The…
Read more about Optimist vs pessimist vs realist: 3 types of colleagues you meet in every change effort
Jun 29, 2026
Holacracy disadvantages: honest criticism and challenges of an innocent framework
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Last week a topic stuck with me long after the Masterclass session ended.The case we discussed was Viisi, the Dutch financial firm that has…
Read more about Holacracy disadvantages: honest criticism and challenges of an innocent framework
Jun 01, 2026
Chain of command: your organization's biggest single point of failure
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
This winter my family and I were driving a campervan through northeast Australia. We started up north in the Daintree rainforest and were…
Read more about Chain of command: your organization's biggest single point of failure
Jun 01, 2026
Role ambiguity: 60 years of research reveals why unclear expectations destroy performance
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
A massive new meta-study just dropped in the Journal of Organizational Behavior.Gargi Sawhney and colleagues synthesized 60 years of role…
Read more about Role ambiguity: 60 years of research reveals why unclear expectations destroy performance
May 18, 2026
Sociocracy 3.0 examples: what a prison, a bank, and an outdoor retailer taught us
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Last week around this time we were in Zurich, Switzerland. Three visits to pioneering organizations. A local gathering with over 140…
Read more about Sociocracy 3.0 examples: what a prison, a bank, and an outdoor retailer taught us
May 04, 2026
The science of social loafing: why groups kill individual effort (and how to fix it)
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
In the 1880s, a French agricultural engineer named Maximilien Ringelmann ran a curious experiment.He asked people to pull a rope. First…
Read more about The science of social loafing: why groups kill individual effort (and how to fix it)
Read all articles

Download: Free Guide

Unlock our in-depth guide on trends, tools, and best practices from over 150 pioneering organizations.

Subscribe below and receive it directly in your inbox.

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.