Ricardo Semler headlines the Corporate Rebels Summit 2026. Amsterdam, 19–20 November.

Explore the summit →

Practicing What They Preach: Self Management at Great Place to Work Netherlands

Maria Lorenzo
Written by Maria Lorenzo September 01, 2025

In 2002, Great Place to Work Netherlands joined the global Great Place to Work network with a clear goal: to create better workplaces for all. For years, it supported organizations through culture diagnostics and recognition programs. Butas interest in purpose driven work deepened, GPTW NL decided to turn the lens on itself.

This blog post is part of 80+ case studies of progressive organizations we created for the ZeroDX awards 2025. These organizations embody the principles of RenDanHeYi in their work structures:

  • Zero Distance to customer: Decision what to build is based on insights from the marketplace

  • Autonomy: Small teams with full decision-making autonomy enable speed in execution

  • Shared Rewards: Everyone in the micro-enterprise participates in its financial success.

After a change in ownership, the Dutch team began a bold internal transition. Formal hierarchies were removed. Teams were encouraged to self organize. The decision was aligned with a broader ambition to decentralize authority.However, it quickly became clear that the absence of defined roles and responsibilities created uncertainty. Autonomy, without structure, led to operational strain. The team recognized that freedom must be supported by clarity.

In 2020, GPTW NL introduced Holacracy as its governance model. Roles were defined in a structured framework,with authority distributed across circles rather than concentrated at the top. This shift reflected a key element of theRenDanHeYi model: enabling individuals to own and lead within the scope of their responsibilities. The organization adopted digital tools to manage these structures transparently, beginning with a pilot in the marketing team.

Over time, this renewed model brought cohesion. With 25 employees, the organization operated as a network of defined roles, each contributing to shared objectives. Transparency became foundational. Salary information was made accessible internally. The organization confirmed that no gender pay gap existed. Ten percent of pre tax profits were distributed equally among team members, reinforcing a shared success model that resonates with RenDanHeYi'sprinciple of linking rewards to value creation.

Professional development received sustained attention. Seven percent of salary costs were dedicated to learning.Feedback systems were separated from pay decisions and designed to support continuous growth. Career progression was benchmarked annually. Together, these practices fostered a sense of fairness and predictability.

Flexibility and trust guided workplace norms. Employees had access to unlimited vacation and could work remotely based on mutual agreements. These policies emphasized responsibility over regulation. The model encouraged each person to manage time and energy in alignment with their role commitments.

The organization's cultural evolution was shaped by four explicit values: We Care, We Challenge, We Are on a Mission, and Together We Got This. These values were more than aspirational statements. They served as principles for daily decisions and long term commitments. For instance, when the COVID 19 crisis struck, the team chose toreduce salaries temporarily rather than lay off colleagues. That collective decision reflected both the value of caring for one another and the belief that challenges should be faced together. It was also an expression of sharedaccountability, where financial sustainability and people’s wellbeing were seen as interdependent.

Inclusion was treated as a practice embedded in operations. From recruitment to client engagements, GPTW NLemphasized psychological safety and belonging. By 2024, internal surveys reported high levels of inclusion. The organization maintained a focus on continual progress, integrating diverse perspectives into its governance and culture.

This internal approach mirrored how GPTW NL engaged with clients. Decentralized teams worked autonomously andadapted quickly to evolving client needs. Customer success roles were empowered to act without escalating decisions. Clients received responsive, tailored support. The organization recorded a Net Promoter Score of 58 in2024, reflecting high client loyalty.

By 2025, the organization’s influence had expanded. Other offices within the global network, including GPTW Austria, began exploring self management tools and governance models based on the Dutch example. GPTW NL contributedpublicly to the broader learning community by sharing insights from its transition.

The organization does not claim completion. It describes its transformation as ongoing, shaped by feedback andreflection. Its model combines clear role ownership, transparency, and shared accountability. In doing so, it aligns withcore RenDanHeYi principles in a professional services context.

Great Place to Work Netherlands continues to evolve its practices while remaining anchored in its mission. It offers a tangible example of how self management, when matched with discipline and purpose, can enhance organizational resilience and culture. The organization’s journey underscores that meaningful transformation is possible even in smallteams, and that consistent alignment between structure and values is key to making work truly work for all.

Written by Maria Lorenzo
Maria Lorenzo
Read more
Jun 29, 2026
Optimist vs pessimist vs realist: 3 types of colleagues you meet in every change effort
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
You probably know the joke already.Three people walk into a bar and stare at a glass of beer.The optimist says, "It's half full."The…
Read more about Optimist vs pessimist vs realist: 3 types of colleagues you meet in every change effort
Jun 29, 2026
Holacracy disadvantages: honest criticism and challenges of an innocent framework
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Last week a topic stuck with me long after the Masterclass session ended.The case we discussed was Viisi, the Dutch financial firm that has…
Read more about Holacracy disadvantages: honest criticism and challenges of an innocent framework
Jun 01, 2026
Chain of command: your organization's biggest single point of failure
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
This winter my family and I were driving a campervan through northeast Australia. We started up north in the Daintree rainforest and were…
Read more about Chain of command: your organization's biggest single point of failure
Jun 01, 2026
Role ambiguity: 60 years of research reveals why unclear expectations destroy performance
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
A massive new meta-study just dropped in the Journal of Organizational Behavior.Gargi Sawhney and colleagues synthesized 60 years of role…
Read more about Role ambiguity: 60 years of research reveals why unclear expectations destroy performance
May 18, 2026
Sociocracy 3.0 examples: what a prison, a bank, and an outdoor retailer taught us
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Last week around this time we were in Zurich, Switzerland. Three visits to pioneering organizations. A local gathering with over 140…
Read more about Sociocracy 3.0 examples: what a prison, a bank, and an outdoor retailer taught us
May 04, 2026
The science of social loafing: why groups kill individual effort (and how to fix it)
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
In the 1880s, a French agricultural engineer named Maximilien Ringelmann ran a curious experiment.He asked people to pull a rope. First…
Read more about The science of social loafing: why groups kill individual effort (and how to fix it)
Read all articles

Download: Free Guide

Unlock our in-depth guide on trends, tools, and best practices from over 150 pioneering organizations.

Subscribe below and receive it directly in your inbox.

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.