Ricardo Semler headlines the Corporate Rebels Summit 2026. Amsterdam, 19–20 November.

Explore the summit →

The Power of Inclusion: Fundació DAU’s Reinvention Through Trust

Maria Lorenzo
Written by Maria Lorenzo September 01, 2025

Fundació DAU was founded with a bold purpose: to improve the lives of people with severe mental disorders by creating access to meaningful work. Based in Barcelona, it employs 180 people, with 60 percent holding disability certificates,and operates across three lines of activity: a pharmaceutical laboratory, a packaging plant, and a labor inclusionprogram. For many years, the foundation delivered strong financial results, yet its structure relied on a traditionalhierarchy that limited transparency and left many employees feeling their potential was not fully recognized.

This blog post is part of 80+ case studies of progressive organizations we created for the ZeroDX awards 2025. These organizations embody the principles of RenDanHeYi in their work structures:

  • Zero Distance to customer: Decision what to build is based on insights from the marketplace

  • Autonomy: Small teams with full decision-making autonomy enable speed in execution

  • Shared Rewards: Everyone in the micro-enterprise participates in its financial success.

In 2023, General Director Anna Cohí chose to face this challenge with courage. Nearing retirement, she wanted to leave a legacy that went beyond stability and numbers. She envisioned an organization where dignity and inclusion were not only its mission but also the way it functioned every day. To make this possible, Fundació DAU began a transformation journey guided by the Consulting Agency Full Circle, which combined cultural renewal with structuralredesign. Every employee took part in a systemic diagnosis, ensuring that the voices of all 180 people shaped the path ahead.

The first stage focused on personal growth. Employees received training in self-management, while Anna and herleadership team undertook a deep process of reflection and change. Anna’s own evolution symbolized the shift in culture: from being perceived as distant, she grew into a facilitator who welcomed dialogue and created safe spaces for others to contribute. This reflected a central RenDanHeYi principle that leadership is not about control but about enabling people to take ownership of their work and their growth.

Once this cultural soil was nurtured, structural transformation could follow. The executive committee was dissolved and replaced with three interconnected meetings. The steering meeting was created for strategy and finance, the care meeting for well-being, and the commitment meeting for daily operations and client needs. Teams democratically elected representatives to these meetings, though participation was open to anyone. Proposals had to be discussed with those affected before being presented, ensuring that decisions carried the weight of collective input. This practiceembodied the principle of distributed authority, while the combination of meetings ensured that strategy, care, and delivery remained balanced.

Teams themselves were redesigned to remain small and purpose-driven, with no more than twenty members. They defined their own goals and created temporary commissions when specific projects required it. By organizing in this way, teams moved closer to the principle of zero distance to users. Their goals were not only framed around externalclients but also around colleagues, particularly those with disabilities, whose daily needs and contributions shaped how value was created. Serving one another with the same dedication as they served external clients turned inclusion into a lived reality rather than a stated intention.

The incentive system was also reimagined. A co-created salary scale introduced five levels of progression in everyteam, giving equal weight to soft skills and technical expertise. Evaluations became peer-led, followed by feedback conversations that supported growth rather than judgment. At the end of eachyear, part of the profits was shared equally among all employees. This alignment of effort, reward, and dignity mirrored the RenDanHeYi principle of connecting value creation directly with value distribution.

Challenges inevitably arose in the early stages. Opening space for honesty brought hidden tensions to the surface, and some people initially struggled with the new responsibilities of self-management. Yet these momentsbecame opportunities to practice courage and mutual support. Over time, the atmosphere shifted. Fear gave way to energy, and employees began to propose improvements, test ideas, and take initiative without waiting for permission. The co-creation of the first strategic plan, developed collectively by employees from different teams and backgrounds,marked a turning point. For the first time, the future of the foundation was not designed by a few at the top but crafted by everyone together.

Today, Fundació DAU thrives as an organization defined by trust, care, and shared purpose. Decision-making balances financial sustainability with well-being and customer focus. Teams operate with autonomy, information is transparent, and inclusion is evident in every practice. The foundation’s mission of integrating people with mentaldisorders into meaningful work is not only its external impact but also its internal way of being.

Fundació DAU’s transformation shows how RenDanHeYi principles can be lived in a setting where social inclusion is at the heart of the mission. Distributed authority became tangible through the steering, care, and commitment meetings, where decisions are made with full transparency and participation. Zero distance to users was redefined, not only through close relationships with clients in demanding industries, but also by treating colleagues with disabilities as valued users of internal services. Alignment of value and reward emerged in a salary system co-createdwith employees, in peer-led evaluations, and in the sharing of profits across the whole workforce. These practices gave structure to what inclusion truly means in daily work. What began as Anna Cohí’s vision for a freer organization has become a lasting cultural shift, proving that even in highly regulated industries, trust and dignity can guide innovation, productivity, and human growth all at once.

Written by Maria Lorenzo
Maria Lorenzo
Read more
Jun 29, 2026
Optimist vs pessimist vs realist: 3 types of colleagues you meet in every change effort
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
You probably know the joke already.Three people walk into a bar and stare at a glass of beer.The optimist says, "It's half full."The…
Read more about Optimist vs pessimist vs realist: 3 types of colleagues you meet in every change effort
Jun 29, 2026
Holacracy disadvantages: honest criticism and challenges of an innocent framework
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Last week a topic stuck with me long after the Masterclass session ended.The case we discussed was Viisi, the Dutch financial firm that has…
Read more about Holacracy disadvantages: honest criticism and challenges of an innocent framework
Jun 01, 2026
Chain of command: your organization's biggest single point of failure
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
This winter my family and I were driving a campervan through northeast Australia. We started up north in the Daintree rainforest and were…
Read more about Chain of command: your organization's biggest single point of failure
Jun 01, 2026
Role ambiguity: 60 years of research reveals why unclear expectations destroy performance
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
A massive new meta-study just dropped in the Journal of Organizational Behavior.Gargi Sawhney and colleagues synthesized 60 years of role…
Read more about Role ambiguity: 60 years of research reveals why unclear expectations destroy performance
May 18, 2026
Sociocracy 3.0 examples: what a prison, a bank, and an outdoor retailer taught us
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Last week around this time we were in Zurich, Switzerland. Three visits to pioneering organizations. A local gathering with over 140…
Read more about Sociocracy 3.0 examples: what a prison, a bank, and an outdoor retailer taught us
May 04, 2026
The science of social loafing: why groups kill individual effort (and how to fix it)
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
In the 1880s, a French agricultural engineer named Maximilien Ringelmann ran a curious experiment.He asked people to pull a rope. First…
Read more about The science of social loafing: why groups kill individual effort (and how to fix it)
Read all articles

Download: Free Guide

Unlock our in-depth guide on trends, tools, and best practices from over 150 pioneering organizations.

Subscribe below and receive it directly in your inbox.

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.