Subscribe to our newsletter to unlock our in-depth guide spotlighting trends, tools, and best practices from over 150 pioneering organizations.

Learn more

Employee Engagement: The Business Case

Pim de Morree
Written by Pim de Morree April 10, 2019

Our recent post, “The Way We Work Is Broken” revealed the engagement sinkhole, and the associated burnout rate. We highlighted the impotence of leaders in solving this problem. We highlighted the gap between current and desired workplaces.

491 1140x0

Now we offer data that shows why organizations urgently need to fix their broken workplaces. This is the business case for employee engagement.

Inhumane and shortsighted

That only 15% of all employees are engaged at work is very, very sad. And though many organizations realise this, it does not spur them to action—to make changes. Their focus stays only on performance—especially money and output. Engagement is a nice-to-have, not a must-have.

This data is a strong wake-up call for all organizations. Beyond the personal pain, the disengagement epidemic severely affects business outcomes. It costs heaps of money!
Click to tweet

But that’s not just inhumane; it’s also painfully short sighted. Here are five reasons why.

1. Return on engagement

If you are not in business for a higher purpose, take a long look at the money first.

When work is exciting and motivational, people thrive and organizations flourish. This is not just our belief. This is reality. The persuasive financial evidence is below.

A Glassdoor‘s Best Places to Work gave much better returns than investing in the average S&P500. Check the stock price data below. It’s impressive!

Stock Investement 1 1

2. Increased performance

A Gallup meta-study highlights the positive influences on organizational success. Workplaces with high employee engagement seriously outperform those with lower scores. Engaging workplaces enjoy higher profitability, productivity and customer ratings. They also have lower turnover, absenteeism, accidents and quality defects.

Gallup’s study clearly reveals the correlation between engagement and business performance. Moreover, the findings are highly consistent across different organizations, industries and parts of the world.

Key Business Outcomes 1

3. Replacement costs

But wait, there’s more. What about the costs of people leaving because they dislike their workplace?

Well, these are probably higher than we imagine. Think of the replacement costs: recruiting, interviewing, new equipment, on-boarding and training. Plus, there’s a lost opportunity cost—the cost to an organization when it can’t grasp opportunities that appear, because roles are vacant or understaffed

Employee Engagement: The Business Case.
Click to tweet

The Center for American Progress found the cost of replacement is around 20% of an employee’s annual salary. For the highest paid jobs, this can be 213% of salary!

4. Cost of absenteeism

Disengagement relates to other costs like absenteeism. Earlier we showed the connection between engagement and sick leave, burnout rates, and so on. Now, let’s look at other associated costs.

Various studies cite absenteeism as accounting for around 15-20 percent (!) of payroll costs (direct and indirect). Some of these are: wages paid to absent employees, wages paid to temporary employees and wages paid for overtime. Oh, and don’t forget the admin expense of managing all this absenteeism.

Then there are other indirect costs: “reduced productivity, poor goods or services because of understaffing or overtime fatigue, safety issues from inadequately trained employees, poor morale from employees who had to do extra work and managers’ time spent on discipline and finding replacements.”

So, take the payroll costs of your company, and do the calculations. Is absenteeism costing you an extra 15-20%, too? It adds up, very quickly!

5. Toxic workers

But we’re not finished yet—there is more. Take the cost of so-called toxic colleagues.

Research by Northwestern University’s Prof. Dylan Minor tries to uncover the cost of toxic workers. With colleagues, he examined worker behaviour. They assessed if they were benefiting the organisation (top performers) or harming it (the toxic workers). They then compared the value of hiring top performers versus parting with toxic ones.

They found that engaged top performers boosted the performance of colleagues. Indeed, the top 1% of these colleagues earned an extra $5,300 for the organization: merely by doing above average.

Then the research gets very interesting. Typically, the cost of a toxic colleague was estimated at $12,800! The cost of being surrounded by toxic colleagues is much greater than the benefit of working with top performers.

The verdict

This data is a strong wake-up call for all organizations. Beyond the personal pain, the disengagement epidemic severely affects business outcomes. It costs heaps of money!

For many organizations, engagement is a nice-to-have, not a must-have. But that’s not just inhumane; it’s also painfully short sighted. Here are five reasons why.
Click to tweet

That’s why it’s time to act. It’s time to lift awareness – everywhere. The more who know, the higher the chance that we can all make an impact.

So, take some action:

  • Share this post online
  • Rally the troops. Get on stage and spread the message inside your team/department/company
  • Join the online community
  • Get inspired twice a week by subscribing to our newsletter. Fill in your email address below.

“Nothing happens until something moves”…

Written by Pim de Morree
Pim de Morree
As co-founder of Corporate Rebels I focus on: researching, writing, speaking, and building our company.
Read more
Dec 17, 2023
The Power of Coaching in Self-Managing Organizations
HappyHenry Written by HappyHenry
Employees in self-managing organizations obviously don't have managers, but that doesn't mean there isn't somebody there to support them.…
Read more about The Power of Coaching in Self-Managing Organizations
May 20, 2023
Lessons from Semco: Productive Relationships with Labor Unions in the Era of Worldwide Strikes
Christian Wandeler Written by Christian Wandeler
In December 2022, Time magazine announced that 2023 would be the year of the union strikes. So far, this prediction has proven true. People…
Read more about Lessons from Semco: Productive Relationships with Labor Unions in the Era of Worldwide Strikes
May 17, 2023
How Citizenship is at the Heart of Self-Governance
Diederick Janse Written by Diederick Janse
I’ve been a passionate practitioner of self-governance for over 15 years. I define it as distributing authority and accountability so…
Read more about How Citizenship is at the Heart of Self-Governance
Apr 15, 2023
From Quiet to Conscious Quitting: Should You Stay or Should You Go?
Marc-Peter Pijper Written by Marc-Peter Pijper
Are my twin 9-year-old daughters old enough for an iPhone? Their argument is that literally EVERYONE in their class already has one, but I…
Read more about From Quiet to Conscious Quitting: Should You Stay or Should You Go?
Mar 18, 2023
F*ck It, I Need a Break! Why Rest and Recovery are Key to Success
Luke Kyte Written by Luke Kyte
The average person in the EU works for 36 years. That’s a helluva long time. And for many people, they have to navigate the trials and…
Read more about F*ck It, I Need a Break! Why Rest and Recovery are Key to Success
Dec 17, 2022
Let’s Fire All The Micromanagers
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Micromanagers are by far the least popular managers. Nobody wants to report to one. Nobody wants to be one. The funny thing about…
Read more about Let’s Fire All The Micromanagers
Read all articles

Download: Free Guide

Unlock our in-depth guide on trends, tools, and best practices from over 150 pioneering organizations.

Subscribe below and receive it directly in your inbox.

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.