EARLY BIRD PROMOTION: Register for the Masterclass by May 31 to secure lifetime(!) access. (Only 7 spots remaining)

More info.

Less Is More: What Organizations Can Learn From Mies Van Der Rohe

Tom van der Lubbe
Written by Tom van der Lubbe October 10, 2020

‘Less is more…’ This phrase, not invented by, but often used by Mies van der Rohe, represents the ideal of creating something so beautiful it cannot be further reduced. Even if you are not a student of architecture, this idea can be understood by looking at the so-called German Pavilion he designed for the 1929 Barcelona International Exposition. Not a single wall of the structure can be removed.

1909 1140x0

State of the art

In the field of architecture, less is more is seen as ‘state of the art’. The principle describes design where reduction represents a higher level of taste.

In organization design, a discipline still referred to as management (although the expression management comes from the French word manage, meaning ‘dresser of horses’), the paradigm seems to be the opposite. Let’s make things as complicated as possible so that, ultimately, nobody understands what it’s about.

Complex & Complicated

Last week, I had the honor of being on a panel at the Rendanheyi Boundaryless Network, an initiative of Haier. The title of the discussion was: ‘How can Microenterprises avoid falling prey to the bureaucratic dilemma?’

While preparing my presentation, I thought of the less is more notion. Why? Because in organization science or management we seem inherently fond of making things complicated.

In architecture, less is more is seen as state of the art. In management the paradigm seems to be the opposite. Let’s make things as complicated as possible so that, ultimately, nobody understands what it’s about.
Click to tweet

I wonder why? Is it the mindset? Or is it inevitable—a natural phenomenon that organizations become more complicated when they grow, be they companies, teams or states? Is it easier to add to something rather than remove it?

Were things less complex in the past? Did we have fewer laws then? Does society operate more efficiently now than it did previously? Are our schools or health systems better now than when there were fewer rules?

It appears to be an unspoken rule that things become more complex as corporations expand, with teams becoming bigger and bigger, until nobody knows who is doing what anymore, and who is responsible.

Is this ever-growing complexity Frederick Taylor's fault? Is it caused by managers or consultants, who justify their existence by explaining in ever more complex cycles how other people have to do their work?

Complex vs. Complicated

Does it make us more intelligent when we make things not only complex but also more complicated? And does being able to explain the difference between them make you appear even more intelligent? If you google the two, you find “Complex refers to detail, while complicated refers to difficulty”.

Complexity is more about how many layers or elements a system has. Complicated seems to be more about how difficult something is. Or to put it in words everybody understands: Does it make us look more intelligent when we complicate things?

Back to less

I like to think we can change the paradigm in organization science and management back to less is more. Let us recapture the beauty of simplicity and reward it as such. Let us realize it is very easy to make things complicated or more complex, and that the real challenge is to make or keep things simple.

Written by Tom van der Lubbe
Tom van der Lubbe
I am an entrepreneur and Co-Founder of Viisi, a mortgage advice company. I believe we should leave the world in a better shape than it was when we were born.
Read more
May 11, 2023
Map of Meaning: Change The Meaning of Work Instead Of Organizational Structure
Pim de Morree Written by Pim de Morree
'Why am I here'? Ever wondered that, at work? How much you value the answer to that question, can be outlined with the map of meaning. Read…
Read more about Map of Meaning: Change The Meaning of Work Instead Of Organizational Structure
Apr 12, 2023
Three New Management Books to Read in the Next Quarter
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
The first quarter of this year was certainly a feast for those who tend to devour management books, as a broad range of hotshot management…
Read more about Three New Management Books to Read in the Next Quarter
Mar 11, 2023
When Traditional Management Creeps Back In: What is Happening at Zappos?
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Last month, I wrote a short piece about how Southwest Airlines was failing its once world-famous status as a progressive firm.…
Read more about When Traditional Management Creeps Back In: What is Happening at Zappos?
Feb 11, 2023
The Modern-day Relevancy Of Theory X and Theory Y
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
In this post, I would like to take the time to shed light on a golden oldie management concept: Theory X vs. Theory Y. Despite being…
Read more about The Modern-day Relevancy Of Theory X and Theory Y
Dec 17, 2022
Let’s Fire All The Micromanagers
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Micromanagers are by far the least popular managers. Nobody wants to report to one. Nobody wants to be one. The funny thing about…
Read more about Let’s Fire All The Micromanagers
Dec 07, 2022
Change the Mindset of Employees with These Three Simple Steps
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
The leader of a large manufacturing company recently complained to me, "I want our people to change their mindset, but they do not change."…
Read more about Change the Mindset of Employees with These Three Simple Steps
Read all articles

Download: Free Guide

Unlock our in-depth guide on trends, tools, and best practices from over 150 pioneering organizations.

Subscribe below and receive it directly in your inbox.

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.